Man-made global warming, due to Carbon Dioxide, is a death-promoting lie from the pit of hell, and I’ll use 5th grade science to prove it.
The whole foundation of the global warming myth is that Carbon Dioxide is a pollutant. Since all lifeforms are carbon based and since most carbon comes from Carbon Dioxide in the atmosphere through the cycle of life, if Carbon Dioxide is a pollutant, then so is every living thing that is made of the carbon that comes from this pollutant. Read that again.
I’m not done.
If all carbon-based lifeforms are pollutants that are sins against nature, then we must be worshipping a false god that seeks the death of all that lives. The Bible calls this false god Satan, Lucifer, the Beast, Beelzebub or whatever else the devil wants to be called these days. You can call your god whatever you want, but I’m not going to worship your putrid little monster of friend. I’m not going to hell for worshipping some false god because I got convinced by some easily impressionable children that carbon is a pollutant.
As promised, the simple 5th grade science.
First, let’s define pollutant. A pollutant is defined as something harmful that pollutes. If it is harmful, that implies that it hinders life. Therefore, the hypothesis that forms the foundation of the man-made global warming myth is that Carbon Dioxide (CO2) is a harmful pollutant that hinders life. (Unfortunately, I don't know how to make the subscripts on this platform for the chemical-equation compounds.)
To make mincemeat of this idea, let’s consider the symbiotic relationship between plants and animals. Plants perform photosynthesis while humans and animals breathe, which is the performance of respiration. These two processes are complimentary and symbiotic.
Photosynthesis: Plants take CO2 gas and H20 (water), mix them with chlorophyll and the energy from sunlight. This process gives off O2 (oxygen) as the plant grows with the creation of C6H12O6 (glucose or sugar). By growing larger, the plants can do even more photosynthesis and create even more oxygen and sugar (tasty fruit for example come when the plant grows large enough). Here’s the process:
6CO2 + 6H20 + sunlight energy + chlorophyll => 6O2 + C6H12O6
Reagents of photosynthesis => products of photosynthesis
Breathing and eating: That’s what animals do. We breathe the O2 created by the plants, and we eat the sugars created by the plants. By eating the sugar, we become larger carbon-based life forms. But we also get rid of some of the carbon in the exhaling phase of respiration. When we take in the oxygen, we give back some of the carbon from the glucose in the form of CO2 gas. The whole process is called respiration, and the chemical reaction is this:
6O2 + C6H12O6 => 6CO2 + 6H20 + energy
Reagents of respiration => products of respiration
Do you see it? The reagents of photosynthesis are the products of respiration, and the products of photosynthesis are the reagents of respiration. A fifth grader can figure this out, and if you can’t, you are not smarter than a fifth grader. That’s embarrassing. Keep reading.
Animals and humans take what the plants produce and then use that to produce what the plants need to produce what animals and humans need to produce what the plants need to produce what animals and humans need to produce what the plants need to produce what...
That’s the symbiotic cycle of life.
So, back to what those who aren’t smarter than a fifth grader contend: CO2 is a pollutant that needs to be eliminated. Let’s say it is eliminated completely, making it the limiting reagent. Without carbon dioxide, plants can’t produce the oxygen and sugar needed by humans to make the carbon dioxide and water so that plants can make oxygen and sugar.
The cycle of life is ended. Everything dies. Without carbon dioxide, all plants die, and without the oxygen and glucose that plants make, all humans and animals die of starvation and suffocation.
What kind of pollutant causes mass death if it is removed? That’s like calling food a pollutant and denying your newborn baby all food. Sure, the baby will starve to death, but at least it was spared the damage that can be done by evil food. Yeah, exactly. Duh.
Yet, Presidential Candidate Peter Buttigieg calls inaction on the efforts to eliminate CO2, the foundation of all life, a “sin”:
Let’s talk in language that is understood across the heartland about faith. If you believe that God is watching, as poison [carbon dioxide] is being belched into the air of creation, and people are being harmed by it. Countries are at risk of vanishing in low lying areas. What does God think of that? It’s messed up.
He’s the self-appointed “Christian” of the Democrat Party. The dude is “married” to another dude, yet the Democrat Party considers him the go-to guy when it comes to interpreting the Bible as something that would make sense to the unchurched. Not being mainline denominational Christian myself, I never go to a gay guy for an interpretation of the Bible, but to each his own.
Regardless, the sage of the Democrat Party calls carbon dioxide a “poison.” Did I mention it’s the foundation of life? Does Peter Buttigieg consider his gay lifestyle a rebellion against God’s desire for us to procreate? Is his habit of having gay sex without procreation a form of penance for his unwillingness to halt his own respiration and therefore his incessant and flagrant spewing of carbon dioxide poison into the atmosphere whenever he exhales? Is this penance to the false god named mother nature (a big ball of dirt) the kind of worship that the God of Abraham commanded him to do when the God of Abraham said, “Thou shalt have no other gods before me?” Or does Peter Buttigieg just read the Bible backwards because he doesn’t like what the God of Abraham did to all his “unrighteous” ancestors at Sodom and Gomorrah? Can those who don’t procreate really have descendants when they don’t procreate? If not, how are those who died at Sodom without children his ancestors? Who, but someone worshipping a false god, would call the foundation of life a poison?
“The questions and many others will be answered on the next episode of Soap.”
If Carbon Dioxide is a pollutant, breathing is a sin, and, if breathing is a sin, then so is living. Where in the Bible does God tell us that living and breathing are sins and that we should kill ourselves so we can stop sinning?
If this kind of demonic logic doesn’t lead you to take the Swedish scientist’s advice to use cannibalism to help fight global warming, it might still lead you to the demented thinking of the Senator Bernie Sanders, also a Democrat presidential candidate. On the idea of global population control, he endorses American taxpayers funding mass abortions of brown and black people in the third world because those that survive his abortion death camps produce the poison of carbon dioxide:
And the Mexico City agreement, which denies American aid to those organizations around the world that are – that allow women to have abortions or even get involved in birth control is totally absurd… So I think especially in poor countries around the world, where women do not necessarily want to have large numbers of babies and where they can have the opportunity to birth control to control the number of kids they have is something I very, very strongly support…
If Hitler were alive today, he’d hear what Bernie Sanders said a couple of days ago in defense of the environment against mankind, and he’d smile and giggle as he realized he’d won. To hear a Jewish man make his racist arguments for genocide and infanticide of non-white people in defense of the environment, which was very dear to Hitler’s heart (even more so than the wellbeing of the humans that resided on the earth), would warm his heart.
Like Hitler, who was a well-known environmentalist and vegetarian occultist and definitely not a follower of Jesus, those who believe that the foundation of life is a poison are worshipping a false god. Or maybe a bunch of false gods – who cares? Living and breathing is not a sin. Don’t think like Hitler.
The only solution to quitting the sin of breathing is willingly killing yourself. Suicide is a murder that leaves the perpetrator with no time to repent and get forgiven. The consequence of suicide is immediate death and the eternal inability to repent for committing that murder. Follow the money. Who benefits from that? – Satan does, not God.
Conclusion: Belief in man-made global warming is the worship of a false god due to a lie from the pit of hell. Bonus points: Hitler would appreciate your belief in man-made global warming, and, if you still believe in it, 5th grade science went right over your head.